Avelox® information for Healthcare Professionals

Clinical Data for Avelox® in Community Acquired Pneumonia

The use of Avelox® (moxifloxacin) in the treatment of community acquired pneumonia (CAP) has been studied in nine large clinical trials in both the community and hospital settings. Clinical comparators have included beta-lactams and macrolides both alone and in combination, and levofloxacin either alone or in combination with ceftriaxone. Avelox® was found to have superior efficacy to amoxicillin/clavulanate in terms of clinical cure rate in the TARGET5 study and equivalent efficacy with other comparators in other studies. Oral Avelox® monotherapy was found to be better tolerated than amoxicillin and/or Clarithromycin in the CAP 20001 study and was similarly tolerated to other comparators in other studies.


Table 1. Summary of Selection of Clinical Trials of Avelox® in Community Acquired Pneumonia

Study
(Author)
Study/Auth CAP 20001 (TORRES, et al.)
Study Design Prospective, multinational, multicentre, randomised, double-blind study
Avelox® Regimen Dose: PO 400mg od
Duration:Up to 14 days
Comparator Drug/dose: Amoxicillin PO 1 g tds or clarithromycin PO 500mg bd alone or in combination
Duration:Up to 14 days
No. of
patients (n) †
446
Primary Endpoint Clinical cure at 7-10 days after therapy
Efficacy Results (Avelox® vs Comparator) Percentage of patients achieving primary endpoint:
93.5% (Avelox® 400mg) vs 93.9% (comparator therapy)
(95% CI: -4.2, 3.3) non-inferiority between treatment groups
Avelox vs Amoxicillin Clinical Response
At 28-35 days follow-up continued clinical cure:
95.3% (Avelox® 400mg) vs 93.7% (comparator therapy)
(95% CI: -2.2, 5.2%) non-inferiority between treatment groups
Safety Results (Avelox® vs Comparator)* Percentage of patients experiencing a drug-related adverse event:
20.0% (Avelox® 400mg) vs 31.0% (comparator therapy)
(P=0.004) statistically significant difference between treatment groups
Study/Auth CAP12 (HOEFFKEN, et al.)
Study Design Prospective, multinational, multicentre, randomised, double-blind study
Avelox® Regimen Dose: PO 200mg or PO 400mg od
Duration:10 days
Note: Avelox® is not licensed for use at a dose of 200mg. Please refer to your local prescribing information for full details of the licensed dosing schedule.
Comparator Drug/dose: Clarithromycin PO 500mg bd
Duration: 10 days
No. of
patients (n) †
538
Primary Endpoint Clinical cure at 3-5 days after therapy
Efficacy Results (Avelox® vs Comparator) Percentage of patients achieving primary endpoint:
93.9% (Avelox® 200mg) vs 94.3% (clarithromycin)
(95% CI: -5.2, 4.8) non-inferiority between treatment groups

94.4% (Avelox® 400mg) vs 94.3% (clarithromycin)
(95% CI: -6.7, 4.1) non-inferiority between treatment groups

93.9% (Avelox® 200mg) vs 94.4% (Avelox® 400mg)
(95% CI: -5.4, 4.6) non-inferiority between treatment groups

Safety Results (Avelox® vs Comparator)* Percentage of patients experiencing a drug-related adverse event:
35.8% (Avelox® 200 mg) vs 37.5% (Avelox® 400 mg) vs 36.5% (clarithromycin)
Study/Auth CAP54 (PETITPRETZ, et al.)
Study Design Prospective, multinational, multicentre, randomised, double-blind study
Avelox® Regimen Dose: PO 400mg od
Duration:10 days
Comparator Drug/dose: Amoxicillin PO 1g tds
Duration: 10 days
No. of
patients (n) †
362
Primary Endpoint Clinical cure at 3-5 days after therapy
Efficacy Results (Avelox® vs Comparator) Percentage of patients achieving primary endpoint:
91.5% (Avelox® 400mg) vs 89.7% (amoxicillin)
(95% CI: -4.2, 7.8) non-inferiority between treatment groups
Avelox vs Amoxicillin Clinical Response
Safety Results (Avelox® vs Comparator)* Percentage of patients experiencing a drug-related adverse event:
28.0% (Avelox® 400mg) vs 20.2% (amoxicillin)
Study/AuthFOGARTY4, (FOGARTY, et al.)
Study Design Prospective, double blind, multicentre study
Avelox® Regimen Dose: PO 400mg od
Duration:10 days
Comparator Drug/dose: Clarithromycin PO 500mg bd
Duration: 10 days
No. of
patients (n) †
382
Primary Endpoint Overall clinical response (cure or clinical improvement after EOT and follow up)
Efficacy Results (Avelox® vs Comparator) Percentage of patients achieving primary endpoint:
95% (Avelox® 400mg) vs 95% (clarithromycin)
(95% CI: -3.7, 5.3) non-inferiority between treatment groups
See Figure 1
Safety Results (Avelox® vs Comparator)* Percentage of patients experiencing a drug-related adverse event:
35.0% (Avelox® 400mg) vs 34.0% (clarithromycin)
Study/AuthTARGET5 (FINCH, et al.)
Study Design Prospective, multinational, multicentre, randomised, open-label study
Avelox® Regimen Dose: IV 400mg od followed by PO 400mg
Duration:7-14 days
Comparator Drug/dose: Amoxicillin/clavulanate IV 1.2 g tds followed by amoxicillin/clavulanate PO 625mg tds ± clarithromycin IV/PO 500mg bd
Duration:7-14 days
No. of
patients (n) †
538
Primary Endpoint Clinical cure at 5-7 days after therapy
Efficacy Results (Avelox® vs Comparator) Percentage of patients achieving primary endpoint (overall population):
93.4% (Avelox® 400mg) vs 85.4% (amoxicillin/clavulanate ± clarithromycin)
(P=0.004; 95% CI: 2.91, 13.19) superiority in favour of Avelox®

Non-severe CAP:
94.6% (Avelox® 400mg) vs 84.7% (amoxicillin/clavulanate ± clarithromycin)

Severe CAP:
92.2% (Avelox® 400mg) vs 84.7% (amoxicillin/clavulanate ± clarithromycin)

At 21-28 days after therapy (overall population):
83.7% (Avelox® 400mg) vs 74.3% (amoxicillin/clavulanate ± clarithromycin)
(95% CI: 2.60, 16.27) superiority in favour of Avelox®

Clinical outcomes at days 5-7 and 21-28 post-treatment
Avelox vs Amoxicillin Clinical Response

Number of patients apyrexic by Day 2:
140 (58.6%) of Avelox® treated patients were apyrexic by day 2, whereas 119 (46.7%) of the patients in the comparator group were apyrexic by day 2 (P = 0.025 by log rank and P = 0.009 by Wilcoxon test)

Safety Results (Avelox® vs Comparator)* Percentage of patients experiencing a drug-related adverse event:
38.9% (Avelox® 400mg) vs 38.9% (amoxicillin/clavulanate ± clarithromycin)

Study/AuthMOXIRAPID6 (WELTE , et al.)
Study Design Prospective, multinational, multicentre, randomised, open-label study
Avelox® Regimen Dose: IV 400mg od followed by PO 400mg
Duration:7-14 days
Comparator Drug/dose: Ceftriaxone IV 2g od ± erythromycin IV 1g every 6-8 h
Duration: 7-14 days
No. of
patients (n) †
317
Primary Endpoint Clinical response (cure or clinical improvement) 5-20 days after therapy
Efficacy Results (Avelox® vs Comparator) Percentage of patients achieving primary endpoint:
85.7% (Avelox® 400mg) vs 86.5% (ceftriaxone ± erythromycin) at 5-20 days
(P=0.1; 95% CI: -7.92, 7.09) non-inferiority between treatment groups

Median time to fever resolution:
3.0 days (Avelox® 400mg) vs 4.0 days (ceftriaxone ± erythromycin) after treatment initiation
(P<0.003) superiority in favour of Avelox®

Mean time to hospital discharge:
9.8 days (Avelox® 400mg) vs 11.1 days (ceftriaxone ± erythromycin)
(P<0.001) superiority in favour of Avelox®
Avelox vs Amoxicillin Clinical Response
Safety Results (Avelox® vs Comparator)* Percentage of patients experiencing a drug-related adverse event:
32.5% (Avelox® 400mg) vs 38.6% (ceftriaxone ± erythromycin)
no statistically significant difference between treatment groups
Study/AuthCAPRIE7 (ANZUETO, et al.)
Study Design Prospective, multicentre, randomised, double-blind study
Avelox® Regimen Dose: IV 400mg od followed by PO 400mg
Duration:7-14 days
Comparator Drug/dose: Levofloxacin IV/PO 500mg od
Duration: 7-14 days
No. of
patients (n) †
281
Primary Endpoint Clinical cure at 5-21 days after therapy
Efficacy Results (Avelox® vs Comparator) Percentage of patients (overall population) achieving primary endpoint:
92.9% (Avelox® 400mg) vs 87.9% (levofloxacin)
(P=0.2; 95% CI: -1.9, 11.9) non-inferiority between treatment groups

Clinical recovery by days 3–5 after the start of treatment (overall population):
97.9% (Avelox® 400mg) vs 90.0% (levofloxacin)
(P=0.01; 95% CI: 1.7, 14.1) superiority in favour of Avelox®
Avelox vs Amoxicillin Clinical Response
Severe CAP:
94.7% (Avelox® 400mg) vs 84.6% (levofloxacin)
(P=0.5; 95% CI: -0.12, 0.32) non-inferiority between treatment groups

Age 65-74 years:
90.0% (Avelox® 400mg) vs 85.0% (levofloxacin)
(P=0.6; 95% CI: -0.09, 0.19) non-inferiority between treatment groups

Age >75 years:
94.5% (Avelox® 400mg) vs 90.0% (levofloxacin)
(P=0.4; 95% CI: -0.05, 0.14) non-inferiority between treatment groups

Safety Results (Avelox® vs Comparator)* Percentage of patients experiencing a drug-related adverse event:
26.2% (Avelox® 400mg) vs 22.6% (levofloxacin)
(P=0.5) no statistically significant difference between treatment groups
No difference in cardiac events (based on ECG monitoring)
Study/AuthMOTIV8 (TORRES, et al.)
Study Design Prospective, multinational, multicentre, randomised, double-blind study
Avelox® Regimen Dose: IV or PO 400mg od
Duration:7-14 days
Comparator Drug/dose: Ceftriaxone IV 2g od + sequential levofloxacin IV/PO 500mg bd
Duration: 7-14 days
No. of
patients (n) †
569
Primary Endpoint Clinical cure 4-14 days after therapy
Efficacy Results (Avelox® vs Comparator) Percentage of patients achieving primary endpoint (overall population):
86.9% (Avelox® 400mg) vs 89.9% (ceftriaxone + levofloxacin)
(95% CI: -8.1, 2.2) non-inferiority between treatment groups
Avelox vs Amoxicillin Clinical Response Pneumonia severity index (PSI) IV/V:
84.6% (Avelox® 400mg) vs 86.8% (ceftriaxone + levofloxacin)
(95% CI: -9.0, 5.8) non-inferiority between treatment groups

Pneumonia severity index (PSI) III:
90.2% (Avelox® 400mg) vs 94.6% (ceftriaxone + levofloxacin)
(95% CI: -11.6, 1.9 P = n.s.) no statistically significant difference between treatment groups
Safety Results (Avelox® vs Comparator)* Percentage of patients experiencing treatment related adverse events:
56.5% (Avelox® 400mg) vs 52.9% (ceftriaxone + levofloxacin)
(P=0.36) no statistically significant difference between treatment groups
Study/AuthPORTIER9 (PORTIER, et al.)
Study Design Prospective, multicentre, randomised , open-label study
Avelox® Regimen Dose: 400mg PO od
Duration:10 days
Comparator Drug/dose: Amoxicillin/clavulanate PO 1,000/125mg tds + roxithromycin PO 150mg bd
Duration: 10 days
No. of
patients (n) †
289
Primary Endpoint Clinical cure 5-7 days after therapy
Efficacy Results (Avelox® vs Comparator) Percentage of patients achieving primary endpoint:
86.8% (Avelox® 400mg) vs 87.0% (amoxicillin/clavulanate + roxithromycin)
(95% CI: -8.0, 7.6) non-inferiority between treatment groups
See Figure 2
Safety Results (Avelox® vs Comparator)* Percentage of patients experiencing a drug-related adverse event:
24.6% (Avelox® 400mg) vs 28.6% (amoxicillin/clavulanate + roxithromycin)
(P=0.4) no statistically significant difference between treatment groups
Table Key

All patient numbers are the per protocol population
* P value data are not always included in the original paper
od Once daily
bd Twice daily
tds Three times daily
CI Confidence interval
IV Intravenous
PO Per oral


Data for Figure 1 is taken from FOGARTY, a pooled analysis of six, prospective, multicentre phase III trials (n=131) evaluating the efficacy of oral or sequential IV/oral moxifloxacin in the treatment of penicillin-, macrolide-, and multidrug-resistant S. pneumoniae10.

 
Clinical and Bacteriological Cure Rates in S. pneumoniae Drug Resistant Isolates 10

Pooled analysis of six prospective, multicenter phase III trials
Multidrug resistant = resistant to at least three antimicrobial classes

Figure 1. Avelox® : Highly Effective Clinical Cure Rates in S. pneumoniae Drug Resistant Isolates10

Data for Figure 2 is taken from the PORTIER trial, a prospective, multicentre, randomised, comparative, open-label study (n=289) comparing moxifloxacin 400mg PO od for 10 days with amoxicillin-clavulanate 1,000/125mg td + roxithromycin 150mg bd9.

Avelox® as Effective As One of The Recommended Combination Regimens In CAP Patients With Risk Factors

Risk factors included age > 65 years, comorbidities (e.g. COPD, diabetes), alcohol consumption, and hospitalisation during the year preceding the study

All patient numbers are the per protocol population.

Figure 2. Clinical Success Rates at Test-of-Cure. Avelox® as Effective As One of The Recommended Combination Regimens In CAP Patients With Risk Factors9

References

  1. Torres A, et al. Eur Respir J 2003; 21: 135-143.
  2. Hoeffken G, et al. Respir Med 2001; 95: 553-564.
  3. Petitpretz P, et al. Chest 2001; 119: 185-195.
  4. Fogarty C, et al. Infect Med 1999; 16: 748-763.
  5. Finch R, et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2002; 46: 46-54.
  6. Welte T, et al. Clin Infect Dis 2005; 41: 1697-1705.
  7. Anzueto A, et al. Clin Infect Dis 2006; 42: 73-81.
  8. Torres A, et al. Clin Infect Dis 2008; 46: 1499-1509.
  9. Portier H, et al. Eur J Microbiol Infect Dis 2005; 24: 367-376.
  10. Fogarty C et al. Int J Clin Pract 2005; 59: 1253–1259.
Avelox® Person - Circles of success